Bg 1.36
pāpam evāśrayed asmān hatvaitān ātatāyinaḥ
tasmān nārhā vayaṁ hantuṁ dhārtarāṣṭrān
sa-bāndhavān
sva-janaṁ hi kathaṁ hatvā sukhinaḥ syāma
mādhava
Bg 1.37
yady apy ete na paśyanti lobhopahata-cetasaḥ
kula-kṣaya-kṛtaṁ doṣaṁ mitra-drohe ca
pātakam
Bg 1.38
kathaṁ na jñeyam asmābhiḥ pāpād asmān
nivartitum
kula-kṣaya-kṛtaṁ doṣaṁ prapaśyadbhir
janārdana
Bg 1.39
kula-kṣaye praṇaśyanti kula-dharmāḥ
sanātanāḥ
dharme naṣṭe kulaṁ kṛtsnam adharmo
’bhibhavaty uta
Bg 1.40/41
adharmābhibhavāt kṛṣṇa praduṣyanti
kula-striyaḥ
strīṣu duṣṭāsu vārṣṇeya jāyate varṇa-saṅkaraḥ
Translation:
36. Killing these sons of Dhritarashtra,
what pleasure can be ours, O Janardana? Sin alone will be our
gain by killing these felons. Therefore we shall not kill the sons of
Dhritarashtra, our relatives; for how can we be happy by
killing our own people, O Madhava?
37. Though these, with their intelligence
clouded by greed, see no evil in the destruction of the families
in the society, and no sin in their cruelty to friends; . . .
38. Why should not we, who clearly see evil
in the destruction of the family-units, learn to turn away from
this sin, O Janardana?
39. In the destruction of a family, the
immemorial religious rites of that family perish; on the destruction
of spirituality, impiety overcomes the whole family.
40/41. By the prevalence of impiety, O Krishna, the women of the
family become corrupt; and women being corrupted, O
descendent of the Vrishni-clan, there arises "intermingling of
castes" (VARNA-SAMKARA) .
Commentary:
…Arjuna seems to draw new inspiration from
his foolishness, and each time his creative intelligence puts forth fresh
arguments in support of his wrong philosophy.
…He indicates here that, when individual
families are destroyed, along with them the religious
traditions of the society will also end, and soon an era of
impiety will be ushered in.
Cultural experiments were the
pre-occupations of our forefathers and they knew that the culture
and tradition of each family was a unit of the total
culture and integrity of the whole nation. Hence the important of
the family- Dharma so seriously brought forth by Arjuna
as an argument against this civil war.
cause for Krishna's attitude. Immediately,
he remembers that the Kaurava brothers were behaving
towards the Pandavas as felons. 'Atatayinah' means
felons, who deserve to be killed according to the Artha
Shastra.
Sin is only a mistake committed by a
misunderstood individual ego against its own Divine
Nature as the Eternal Soul. To act as the body or the
mind or the intellect is not to act up to the responsibilities of
a man but it becomes an attempt to behave under the impulses
of an animal. All those acts performed and
motives entertained, which create grosser mental impressions and
thereby build stronger walls between us and our
cognition of the Real Divine Spark in ourselves are called
sins.
Arjuna's seemingly learned objection to
killing enemies is a misinterpretation of our sacred texts
(Shastra), and to have acted upon it would have been suicidal
to our very culture. Therefore, Krishna refuses to show
any sign either of appreciation or criticism of Arjuna's
stand. The Lord understands that his friend is raving
hysterically and the best policy is to allow a mental patient
first of all to bring
out everything in his mind and thus exhaust
himself.
Here, Arjuna concludes his seemingly
logical arguments which have got a false look of Hindu
scriptural sanction. More than deliberate blasphemers of a
scripture, the unconscious misinterpreters of a sacred
text are the innocent criminals who bring about the
wretched downfall of its philosophy. Purring with
the satisfaction of a cat in the kitchen, Arjuna, in this
verse, is licking up his arguments all round and is coming to the
dangerous conclusion that he should not kill the
aggressors, nor face
their heartless challenge! Even then
Krishna is silent.
Arjuna's discomfiture makes him really
quite conspicuous in his ugliness. In the second line of the
stanza, he makes a personal appeal to Krishna and almost begs
of him to think for himself and endorse Partha's own
lunatic conclusions.
With the familiarity born out of his
long-standing friendship, Arjuna addresses his charioteer
with affection as Madhava, and asks him how one can come
to any happiness after one has destroyed one's own
kinsmen... Still, Krishna remains silent.
No doubt, the Kauravas, grown blind in
their greed for power and wealth, cannot see the
destruction of the entire social structure by this war. Their
ambition has so completely clouded their intelligence and
sensibility that they fail to appreciate or understand the
cruelty in annihilating their own friends.
But Arjuna seems to retain his reasoning
capacity and can clearly foresee the chaos in which society
will get buried by fratricidal war. Now his argument
amounts to this: if a friend of ours, in his drunkenness, behaves
nastily, it would be worse than drunkenness in us, if
we were to retaliate; for, we are expected to know
that our friend, with his fumed-up intelligence, does not
entertain enough
discriminative awareness of what he is
doing. At such moments, it would be our duty to forgive
the mischief and overlook the impudence.
Similarly, here, Arjuna argues: "If
Duryodhana and his friends are behaving as blind aggressors,
should the Pandavas not retire quietly and suffer the
ignominy of a defeat, and consider it their dutiful
offering at the altar of peace?" How far this philosophy is
dangerous in itself will be seen as we read more and more the
passages of the Geeta and come to appreciate the pith of
its philosophy which is the very kernel of our Hindu
way-of-living. "Active resistance to evil" is
the central idea in the doctrine expounded by Krishna in the Geeta.
Can't hear the chanting sadly
ReplyDeleteAm very pleased though to see the positive effort A million thanks to all of you
Bharat